What is Valence Bond Theory?
Valence Bond Theory (VBT) is a quantum mechanical model that describes chemical bonding by explaining how atomic orbitals overlap to form covalent bonds. Developed by Linus Pauling and others in the 1930s, VBT uses the concepts of orbital overlap, hybridization, and resonance to explain molecular structure and bonding.
Historical Background
Valence Bond Theory was developed in 1927 by Walter Heitler and Fritz London, who first applied quantum mechanics to explain the hydrogen molecule (H₂). The theory was significantly expanded by Linus Pauling in the 1930s, who introduced the concept of hybridization and won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1954) for his work on the nature of the chemical bond.
Fundamental Principles of VBT
Core Concepts:
- Orbital Overlap: Covalent bonds form when atomic orbitals on different atoms overlap
- Electron Pairing: Each bond involves two electrons with opposite spins
- Maximum Overlap: Stronger bonds result from greater orbital overlap
- Hybridization: Atomic orbitals mix to form new hybrid orbitals for better bonding
- Sigma (σ) and Pi (π) Bonds: Different types of overlap create different bond types
- Resonance: Some molecules require multiple bonding structures to describe accurately
The Overlap Principle
According to VBT, a covalent bond forms when:
- Two half-filled atomic orbitals overlap
- The overlapping region contains a pair of electrons with opposite spins
- The electron density between nuclei increases, creating attraction
- The greater the overlap, the stronger the bond
Types of Orbital Overlap
1. Sigma (σ) Bonds
Head-on overlap of atomic orbitals along the internuclear axis
- s-s overlap (e.g., H₂)
- s-p overlap (e.g., HCl)
- p-p overlap (end-to-end)
- Cylindrically symmetrical around bond axis
- Allows free rotation around the bond
- Stronger than π bonds
2. Pi (π) Bonds
Sideways overlap of p orbitals perpendicular to the internuclear axis
- p-p overlap (side-by-side)
- Electron density above and below the internuclear axis
- Restricts rotation around the bond
- Weaker than σ bonds
- Always accompanied by a σ bond in multiple bonds
Bond Composition Examples:
Single Bond: 1 σ bond (e.g., C-C in ethane)
Double Bond: 1 σ + 1 π bond (e.g., C=C in ethene)
Triple Bond: 1 σ + 2 π bonds (e.g., C≡C in ethyne)
Hybridization
Hybridization is the mixing of atomic orbitals to form new hybrid orbitals with equivalent energy and specific geometries, allowing for better overlap and stronger bonds.
sp Hybridization
Geometry: Linear
Bond Angle: 180°
Examples: BeCl₂, C₂H₂ (acetylene)
Bonds: 2 σ bonds
Unhybridized: 2 p orbitals (can form π bonds)
sp² Hybridization
Geometry: Trigonal Planar
Bond Angle: 120°
Examples: BF₃, C₂H₄ (ethene), CO₃²⁻
Bonds: 3 σ bonds
Unhybridized: 1 p orbital (can form π bond)
sp³ Hybridization
Geometry: Tetrahedral
Bond Angle: 109.5°
Examples: CH₄, NH₃, H₂O
Bonds: 4 σ bonds or bonding pairs/lone pairs
Unhybridized: None
sp³d Hybridization
Geometry: Trigonal Bipyramidal
Bond Angles: 90°, 120°, 180°
Examples: PCl₅, PF₅
Bonds: 5 σ bonds
Note: Requires d orbitals (period 3+)
sp³d² Hybridization
Geometry: Octahedral
Bond Angle: 90°, 180°
Examples: SF₆, [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺
Bonds: 6 σ bonds
Note: Common in coordination compounds
dsp² Hybridization
Geometry: Square Planar
Bond Angle: 90°, 180°
Examples: [Ni(CN)₄]²⁻, [PtCl₄]²⁻
Bonds: 4 σ bonds
Note: Inner orbital complex
VBT Applied to Coordination Compounds
Valence Bond Theory was historically used to explain the structure and bonding in transition metal complexes before Crystal Field Theory became dominant.
Inner Orbital vs. Outer Orbital Complexes
| Property | Inner Orbital Complex | Outer Orbital Complex |
|---|---|---|
| d Orbitals Used | (n-1)d orbitals | nd orbitals |
| Hybridization | d²sp³ (octahedral) dsp² (square planar) |
sp³d² (octahedral) |
| Ligand Field | Strong field ligands | Weak field ligands |
| Magnetic Nature | Low spin (fewer unpaired e⁻) | High spin (more unpaired e⁻) |
| Bond Strength | Stronger (more covalent) | Weaker (more ionic) |
| Example | [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ (d²sp³) | [CoF₆]³⁻ (sp³d²) |
Example: [Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺ Complex
Co³⁺: d⁶ configuration (3d⁶)
Hybridization: d²sp³ (inner orbital)
Geometry: Octahedral
Magnetic: Diamagnetic (no unpaired electrons)
Reason: NH₃ is a strong field ligand causing electron pairing in 3d orbitals
Connection to Crystal Field Theory
While VBT explains bonding through orbital overlap and hybridization, Crystal Field Theory (CFT) takes a different approach by treating ligands as point charges and explaining d-orbital splitting.
Key Differences:
- VBT: Focuses on covalent bonding and orbital overlap
- CFT: Focuses on electrostatic interactions and d-orbital energy levels
- VBT: Explains geometry through hybridization
- CFT: Explains color and magnetism better
Resonance in VBT
Resonance occurs when a single Lewis structure cannot adequately describe a molecule. The actual structure is a hybrid of multiple resonance structures.
Key Points about Resonance:
- Resonance structures differ only in electron placement, not atom positions
- The actual molecule is a resonance hybrid (average of all structures)
- All resonance structures must obey octet rule (with exceptions)
- More resonance structures = greater stability
- Equivalent structures contribute equally to the hybrid
Classic Resonance Examples:
Benzene (C₆H₆): Two equivalent structures with alternating double bonds
Carbonate Ion (CO₃²⁻): Three equivalent structures
Nitrate Ion (NO₃⁻): Three equivalent structures
Ozone (O₃): Two equivalent structures
Comparison: VBT vs. MOT vs. CFT
| Aspect | Valence Bond Theory | Molecular Orbital Theory | Crystal Field Theory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Approach | Localized bonds from orbital overlap | Delocalized electrons in molecular orbitals | Electrostatic ligand-metal interactions |
| Bond Type | Covalent | Covalent | Ionic (simplified) |
| Geometry Prediction | Excellent (via hybridization) | Good | Limited |
| Magnetism | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
| Color Explanation | Limited | Good | Excellent |
| Complexity | Moderate | High | Moderate |
| Best For | Organic molecules, simple structures | Paramagnetic species, O₂ | Transition metal complexes |
Strengths of Valence Bond Theory
- Provides an intuitive, visual model of chemical bonding
- Excellently predicts molecular geometry through hybridization
- Explains directionality of covalent bonds
- Successfully describes sigma and pi bonding
- Accounts for bond strength through orbital overlap
- Introduces resonance concept for molecules with delocalized electrons
- Works well for organic chemistry applications
Limitations of Valence Bond Theory
- Paramagnetism of O₂: Cannot explain why oxygen is paramagnetic
- Electron delocalization: Poor treatment of delocalized π systems
- Quantitative predictions: Limited ability to predict bond energies and lengths
- Transition metal complexes: Less accurate than CFT for color and magnetism
- Hypervalent molecules: Controversial use of d-orbital participation
- Metallic bonding: Cannot adequately explain properties of metals
- Computational difficulty: Harder to implement in quantum calculations
These limitations led to the development of Molecular Orbital Theory, which provides a more complete quantum mechanical description of bonding.
Important Formulas and Rules
Determining Hybridization:
- Steric Number 2 → sp (linear)
- Steric Number 3 → sp² (trigonal planar)
- Steric Number 4 → sp³ (tetrahedral)
- Steric Number 5 → sp³d (trigonal bipyramidal)
- Steric Number 6 → sp³d² (octahedral)
VSEPR and VBT Connection:
VSEPR (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) predicts geometry based on electron pair repulsion, which corresponds to VBT hybridization:
- VSEPR geometry → Determines hybridization type
- Lone pairs occupy hybrid orbitals
- Lone pairs repel more than bonding pairs
Study Tips for VBT
- Master drawing orbital overlap diagrams for σ and π bonds
- Practice determining hybridization from molecular formulas
- Understand the relationship between hybridization and geometry
- Learn to draw resonance structures correctly
- Know which orbitals remain unhybridized for each type
- Connect VSEPR theory with VBT hybridization schemes
- Understand when VBT is appropriate vs. when to use MOT or CFT
- Practice with coordination compound examples
Related Topics to Explore
- Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT): More advanced bonding theory with delocalized electrons
- Crystal Field Theory (CFT): Electrostatic approach for coordination compounds
- Ligand Field Theory (LFT): Combines VBT and CFT concepts
- VSEPR Theory: Predicts molecular geometry from electron pair repulsion
- Lewis Structures: Foundation for understanding VBT
- Molecular Symmetry: Group theory applications to bonding
- Bent's Rule: Predicts orbital character in bonds
Explore Related Topics
Continue your chemistry learning journey:
← Back to Chemistry Basics Learn about Crystal Field Theory →